Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Bibb

Medical Oncology Scottsdale, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1881733889 CMS profile 266603

8283 N Hayden Rd Ste 155, Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$713

40 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, John Bibb of Scottsdale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $713 across 40 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 29th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $25 1
2022 General $34 2
2021 General $19 1
2020 General $23 1
2019 General $613 35

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Bibb
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Bibb were reported at $0. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year John Bibb Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $613 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $23 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $19 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $34 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $25 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $0 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $0 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Genzyme Corporation $150 4 payments
  2. Eisai Inc. $110 7 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $67 5 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $45 3 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $38 2 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $37 2 payments
  7. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $25 1 payment
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $25 2 payments
  9. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $21 1 payment
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $21 1 payment
  11. Other $176 12 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $713 40 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Lenvima Oncology $110 7 payments
  2. LEMTRADA $104 1 payment
  3. KEYTRUDA $67 5 payments
  4. CYRAMZA $38 2 payments
  5. XTANDI $37 2 payments
  6. LENVIMA Oncology $35 3 payments
  7. OPDIVO $30 2 payments
  8. EPKINLY $25 1 payment
  9. IMBRUVICA $25 1 payment
  10. NERLYNX $21 1 payment
  11. Other $348 23 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

1,145

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$3,569,253

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

40.5%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 66 $1,467,339
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 43 $687,876
Lenalidomide Generic 31 $439,150
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 25 $379,954
Ninlaro Ixazomib Citrate Brand 26 $333,101
Pegasys Peginterferon Alfa-2a Brand 20 $84,837
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 92 $82,782
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 74 $75,745
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 21 $5,222
Enoxaparin Sodium Generic 20 $3,780

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$110,390

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

683

Average age 76

Services billed

2,067

343 women, 340 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Cancer 36%
Diabetes 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Depression 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

40 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record