Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joel Shebowich

Internal Medicine Centennial, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1366468902 CMS profile 61888

13111 E Briarwood Ave Ste 215, Centennial, CO 80112

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$32,390

765 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Joel Shebowich of Centennial, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $32,390 across 765 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,928 11
2024 General $1,577 92
2023 General $2,090 106
2022 General $2,005 106
2021 General $3,587 157
2020 General $9,229 148
2019 General $10,974 145

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joel Shebowich
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joel Shebowich were reported at $2,928. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Joel Shebowich Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $10,974 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $9,229 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,587 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,005 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,090 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,577 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,928 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $17,104 43 payments
  2. National Marrow Donor Program $2,869 9 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,745 81 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,410 78 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,291 90 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $985 71 payments
  7. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $846 40 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $835 65 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $613 35 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $507 28 payments
  11. Other $4,185 225 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $13,945 13 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $13,416 735 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,848 12 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $150 1 payment
  5. Education $31 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Epclusa $13,205 21 payments
  2. Repatha $978 73 payments
  3. UBRELVY $910 35 payments
  4. Ozempic $747 50 payments
  5. Otezla $622 44 payments
  6. FARXIGA $597 35 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $569 36 payments
  8. XARELTO $447 25 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $446 37 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $389 30 payments
  11. Other $11,449 667 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 103 drugs

Part D claims

5,514

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$668,565

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 81 $128,012
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 62 $101,139
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 55 $68,615
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 63 $58,814
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 21 $47,680
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 37 $35,624
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 21 $29,526
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 14 $20,843
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 16 $20,697
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 11 $16,064

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 103 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$63,587

Of which drugs: $10,160

Medicare patients

237

Average age 73

Services billed

1,247

118 women, 119 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 40%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 25%
Depression 21%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Cancer 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 19 19 $5,494
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 56 56 $4,572

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $138
$138 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $138
$138 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $125
$125 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $96
$96 14 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $80
$80 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

765 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record