Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jillian Rosengard

Clinical Neurophysiology Bronx, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1528320397 CMS profile 1402053

111 E 210Th St Dept Of, Bronx, NY 10467

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,221

30 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jillian Rosengard of Bronx, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,221 across 30 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 49th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $260 2
2024 General $200 1
2023 General $187 3
2022 General $150 3
2020 General $103 5
2019 General $321 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jillian Rosengard
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jillian Rosengard were reported at $260. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Jillian Rosengard Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $321 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $103 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $0 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $150 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $187 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $200 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $260 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $438 10 payments
  2. SK Life Science, Inc. $260 2 payments
  3. NeuroPace, Inc. $150 1 payment
  4. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $119 4 payments
  5. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $69 3 payments
  6. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $67 4 payments
  7. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. $51 3 payments
  8. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $43 2 payments
  9. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $23 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,198 29 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $23 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Epidiolex $186 8 payments
  2. RNS Neurostimulator Kit $150 1 payment
  3. Vimpat $96 6 payments
  4. GOCOVRI $69 3 payments
  5. SYMPAZAN $51 3 payments
  6. APTIOM $43 2 payments
  7. INBRIJA $23 1 payment
  8. Briviact $22 2 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,322

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$434,132

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

21.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 23 $135,510
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 37 $59,979
Banzel Rufinamide Brand 19 $53,814
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 15 $30,104
Trokendi Xr Topiramate Brand 11 $25,150
Rufinamide Generic 28 $23,183
Lacosamide Generic 169 $19,857
Vimpat Lacosamide Brand 20 $17,874
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 13 $13,875
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 13 $13,203

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,952

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

138

Average age 69

Services billed

296

76 women, 62 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 62%
Arthritis 48%
Depression 43%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Alzheimer's or dementia 41%
Heart failure 40%
Chronic kidney disease 40%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

30 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record