Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jesus Hernandez

Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1083750913 CMS profile 3786

271 Fort Washington Ave, Suite Aa, New York, NY 10032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,951

535 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jesus Hernandez of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,951 across 535 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $863 25
2024 General $1,235 35
2023 General $2,028 98
2022 General $2,173 107
2021 General $2,784 137
2020 General $1,261 65
2019 General $1,607 68

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jesus Hernandez
  • Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation median
  • Middle half of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jesus Hernandez were reported at $863. Among 4,146 Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation profiles paid that year, the median was $139 and the middle half received between $48 and $410.

Show as a table
Year Jesus Hernandez Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation median Middle half National median
2019 $1,607 $133 $45–$390 $163
2020 $1,261 $88 $29–$272 $114
2021 $2,784 $116 $33–$360 $132
2022 $2,173 $123 $40–$378 $149
2023 $2,028 $131 $43–$396 $160
2024 $1,235 $141 $45–$409 $164
2025 $863 $139 $48–$410 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,316 127 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,672 68 payments
  3. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,384 81 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,170 38 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $818 21 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $763 27 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $480 45 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $424 13 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $423 15 payments
  10. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $315 12 payments
  11. Other $2,186 88 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,878 529 payments
  2. Education $72 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $1,150 60 payments
  2. JARDIANCE $1,081 32 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $859 60 payments
  4. FARXIGA $855 37 payments
  5. Ozempic $645 26 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $619 25 payments
  7. LINZESS $541 41 payments
  8. Kerendia $447 16 payments
  9. XARELTO $424 13 payments
  10. BREZTRI $414 17 payments
  11. Other $6,349 306 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 153 drugs

Part D claims

10,334

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$1,218,949

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 184 $170,486
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 182 $128,829
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 113 $103,415
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 109 $97,901
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 98 $83,131
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 22 $60,542
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 39 $47,948
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 47 $46,614
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 57 $45,259
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 68 $41,531

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 153 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$120,418

Of which drugs: $2,728

Medicare patients

225

Average age 79

Services billed

2,284

163 women, 62 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 67%
Diabetes 48%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 20%
Alzheimer's or dementia 17%
Heart failure 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 12 48 $2,669
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 15 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $363
$363 109 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $296
$296 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $168
$168 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $72
  • Bayer Healthcare LLC $24
$96 57 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $78
$78 38 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

535 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record