Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeremy Hogstrom

Internal Medicine Chattanooga, TN Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1487117313 CMS profile 8807539

3739 Hixson Pike, Chattanooga, TN 37415

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,647

515 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeremy Hogstrom of Chattanooga, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,647 across 515 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $19,304 194
2024 General $3,194 150
2023 General $5,205 120
2022 General $1,776 46
2021 General $167 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeremy Hogstrom
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeremy Hogstrom were reported at $19,304. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Jeremy Hogstrom Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $167 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,776 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,205 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,194 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $19,304 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $16,066 28 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,217 11 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,821 75 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,619 54 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $908 54 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $878 46 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $641 40 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $590 25 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $414 13 payments
  10. ITI, Inc. $411 24 payments
  11. Other $3,082 145 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $15,600 1 payment
  2. Food and Beverage $10,897 513 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $3,150 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. PAXLOVID $15,695 6 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,398 64 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,271 63 payments
  4. AIRSUPRA $880 25 payments
  5. FARXIGA $818 27 payments
  6. Kerendia $590 25 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $491 29 payments
  8. Repatha $462 19 payments
  9. UBRELVY $417 25 payments
  10. CAPLYTA $355 21 payments
  11. Other $7,143 377 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 94 drugs

Part D claims

4,360

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$373,731

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 77 $88,325
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 50 $54,226
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $53,648
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 47 $49,812
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 27 $23,508
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 20 $20,294
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 13 $7,340
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 18 $5,531
Valsartan Generic 41 $3,784
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 11 $3,750

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 94 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$69,780

Of which drugs: $5,980

Medicare patients

155

Average age 75

Services billed

2,415

75 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 14 14 $4,025
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 22 22 $1,531
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 920 $89

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $348
$348 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $278
$278 50 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $224
$225 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $224
$225 50 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $172
$172 47 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

515 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record