Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeremy Derickson

Physician Assistant Mesa, AZ Physician Assistant

NPI 1821544503 CMS profile 11106923

2310 E Brown Rd, Mesa, AZ 85213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,973

383 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeremy Derickson of Mesa, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,973 across 383 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,191 58
2024 General $1,369 66
2023 General $1,650 96
2022 General $1,319 79
2021 General $1,445 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeremy Derickson
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeremy Derickson were reported at $1,191. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Jeremy Derickson Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,445 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,319 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,650 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,369 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,191 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,108 80 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $924 31 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $631 34 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $461 33 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $428 23 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $311 14 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $301 16 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $265 13 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $230 14 payments
  10. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $213 13 payments
  11. Other $2,102 112 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,959 382 payments
  2. Entertainment $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $928 68 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $915 64 payments
  3. FARXIGA $691 16 payments
  4. BREZTRI $593 12 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $547 29 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $495 7 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $264 19 payments
  8. Kerendia $230 14 payments
  9. HETLIOZ $213 13 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $185 11 payments
  11. Other $4,538 248 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

4,089

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$330,418

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

18.8%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 60 $63,076
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 30 $46,542
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 25 $40,216
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 27 $33,672
Prolia Denosumab Brand 15 $26,317
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 14 $21,834
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 16 $18,231
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 15 $17,101
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 11 $16,001
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 314 $2,474

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$42,518

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

228

Average age 75

Services billed

815

79 women, 149 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 38%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 21%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Cancer 14%
Heart failure 12%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $118
$118 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $96
$96 30 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $91
$91 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $78
$78 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $77
$77 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

383 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record