Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jennifer Compton

Physician Assistant Tulsa, OK Physician Assistant

NPI 1174560361 CMS profile 10455182

6585 S Yale Ave Ste 720, Tulsa, OK 74136

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,273

655 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jennifer Compton of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,273 across 655 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,231 114
2024 General $3,198 150
2023 General $2,296 119
2022 General $2,414 137
2021 General $3,134 135

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jennifer Compton
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jennifer Compton were reported at $1,231. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Jennifer Compton Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $3,134 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,414 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,296 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $3,198 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,231 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,542 69 payments
  2. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $1,532 15 payments
  3. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $1,117 167 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,099 74 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $1,040 53 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $940 22 payments
  7. Coloplast Corp $800 43 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $764 35 payments
  9. Boston Scientific Corporation $396 20 payments
  10. Medtronic, Inc. $377 8 payments
  11. Other $2,666 149 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,307 644 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $923 7 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $788 1 payment
  4. Education $255 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Axonics $1,566 17 payments
  2. Bulkamid $1,402 11 payments
  3. ERLEADA $1,374 62 payments
  4. GEMTESA $1,176 178 payments
  5. XTANDI $1,160 59 payments
  6. BOTOX $827 2 payments
  7. ORGOVYX $751 34 payments
  8. LUPRON DEPOT $734 41 payments
  9. MYRBETRIQ $510 35 payments
  10. TALZENNA $427 18 payments
  11. Other $5,846 329 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

3,233

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$748,719

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

37.4%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 538 $451,685
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 313 $227,619
Estradiol Generic 292 $16,648
Trospium Chloride Generic 142 $10,365
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 484 $8,795
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 189 $5,896
Trimethoprim Generic 76 $5,401
Finasteride Generic 224 $4,827
Cephalexin Generic 354 $3,134
Osphena Ospemifene Brand 11 $2,582

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$121,075

Of which drugs: $18,520

Medicare patients

902

Average age 76

Services billed

14,465

618 women, 284 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Depression 32%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Osteoporosis 23%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Bcg live intravesical instillation, 1 mg J9030 Office 27 5,441 $11,577
Injection, ertapenem sodium, 500 mg J1335 Office 13 76 $690

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ERLEADA
$451 — —
ORGOVYX
$249 — —
GEMTESA
$228 538 —
LUPRON DEPOT
$123 — —
BOTOX
$81 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

655 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record