Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Sassmannshausen

Fort Wayne, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1316928195 CMS profile 1300672

5650 Coventry Ln, Fort Wayne, IN 46804

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$488,913

2,031 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Sassmannshausen of Fort Wayne, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $488,913 across 2,031 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $56,734 222
2024 General $103,071 337
2023 General $87,074 342
2022 General $39,269 290
2021 General $45,174 255
2020 General $19,014 184
2019 General $138,576 401

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Sassmannshausen
  • Indiana median
  • Middle half of Indiana
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Sassmannshausen were reported at $56,734. Among 20,565 Indiana profiles paid that year, the median was $180 and the middle half received between $52 and $617.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Sassmannshausen Indiana median Middle half National median
2019 $138,576 $168 $50–$632 $163
2020 $19,014 $107 $35–$375 $114
2021 $45,174 $137 $39–$503 $132
2022 $39,269 $151 $44–$537 $149
2023 $87,074 $166 $49–$580 $160
2024 $103,071 $180 $50–$625 $164
2025 $56,734 $180 $52–$617 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $83,716 354 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $70,747 86 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $63,957 144 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $53,819 147 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $45,447 128 payments
  6. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $35,362 53 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $30,000 137 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $25,764 120 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $24,462 80 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $11,714 97 payments
  11. Other $43,927 685 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $320,090 112 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $66,682 139 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $50,502 25 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $45,304 1,733 payments
  5. Honoraria $5,400 2 payments
  6. Education $934 20 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $63,689 83 payments
  2. Bimzelx $50,250 82 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $48,671 164 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $41,229 107 payments
  5. TALTZ $39,610 104 payments
  6. VTAMA $36,128 56 payments
  7. RINVOQ $28,682 116 payments
  8. CIBINQO $24,797 75 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $22,525 26 payments
  10. SOTYKTU $21,078 75 payments
  11. Other $109,013 1,284 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

1,591

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,530,540

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

17.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 31 $397,374
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 24 $206,773
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 52 $201,651
Bimzelx Autoinjector Bimekizumab-Bkzx Brand 12 $200,323
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 22 $143,572
Otezla Apremilast Brand 25 $130,428
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 16 $119,917
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 23 $85,539
Fluorouracil Generic 126 $8,808
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 180 $7,756

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$516,831

Of which drugs: $82,611

Medicare patients

1,114

Average age 74

Services billed

13,714

567 women, 547 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 16%
Depression 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 25 70 $20,842

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$36,546 12 —
DUPIXENT
$16,372 75 —
SKYRIZI
$10,771 — —
CIBINQO
$10,681 — —
RINVOQ
$9,896 22 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

2,031 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record