Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Kam

Pediatric Allergy/Immunology Honolulu, HI Medical Doctor

NPI 1669561841 CMS profile 467852

888 S King St, # 2, Honolulu, HI 96813

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$141

6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Kam of Honolulu, HI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $141 across 6 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 17th percentile of Pediatric Allergy/Immunology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14 1
2023 General $76 4
2019 General $51 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Kam
  • Pediatric Allergy/Immunology median
  • Middle half of Pediatric Allergy/Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Kam were reported at $14. Among 289 Pediatric Allergy/Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $361 and the middle half received between $125 and $2,493.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Kam Pediatric Allergy/Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $51 $325 $92–$1,399 $163
2020 $0 $144 $66–$2,490 $114
2021 $0 $357 $95–$2,633 $132
2022 $0 $385 $125–$2,259 $149
2023 $76 $470 $121–$2,946 $160
2024 $0 $317 $125–$2,583 $164
2025 $14 $361 $125–$2,493 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $51 1 payment
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $27 2 payments
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $23 1 payment
  4. Blueprint Medicines Corporation $20 1 payment
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $141 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT $51 1 payment
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $27 2 payments
  3. TAKHZYRO $23 1 payment
  4. AYVAKIT $20 1 payment
  5. FASENRA $20 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,336

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$718,476

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 37 $140,238
Nucala Mepolizumab Brand 39 $140,081
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 47 $125,402
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 102 $99,126
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 68 $75,483
Ipratropium Bromide Generic 302 $24,174
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 19 $14,550
Advair Hfa Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 19 $10,424
Azelastine Hcl Generic 188 $10,191
Montelukast Sodium Generic 297 $10,023

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,631

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

281

Average age 74

Services billed

687

189 women, 92 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 36%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Osteoporosis 26%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Cancer 12%
COPD 9%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

6 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record