Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Cobb

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Greenville, SC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1376028167 CMS profile 10562171

905 Verdae Blvd Ste 204, Greenville, SC 29607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,479

522 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Cobb of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,479 across 522 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,315 142
2024 General $1,978 119
2023 General $1,778 109
2022 General $1,039 66
2021 General $1,369 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Cobb
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Cobb were reported at $2,315. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Cobb Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $1,369 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $1,039 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $1,778 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $1,978 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $2,315 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,101 147 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,201 80 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $809 65 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $629 32 payments
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $504 23 payments
  6. Ardelyx, Inc. $408 24 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $336 17 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $321 10 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $256 10 payments
  10. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $235 10 payments
  11. Other $1,679 104 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,340 519 payments
  2. Education $138 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. XIFAXAN $1,092 73 payments
  2. CREON $671 51 payments
  3. LINZESS $618 49 payments
  4. RINVOQ $604 38 payments
  5. STELARA $582 41 payments
  6. ENTYVIO $532 28 payments
  7. IBSRELA $408 24 payments
  8. TREMFYA $389 44 payments
  9. MAVYRET $340 25 payments
  10. DUPIXENT $321 10 payments
  11. Other $4,155 264 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

824

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$196,182

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

36.3%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 23 $51,397
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 46 $48,888
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 12 $31,993
Viberzi Eluxadoline Brand 12 $18,261
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 11 $14,941
Colestipol Hcl Generic 66 $6,264
Budesonide Ec Budesonide Brand 18 $4,742
Mesalamine Dr Mesalamine Brand 11 $3,897
Budesonide Dr Budesonide Brand 54 $3,019
Esomeprazole Magnesium Generic 27 $2,708

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$42,103

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

454

Average age 75

Services billed

800

262 women, 192 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Diabetes 36%
Depression 30%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Cancer 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $220
$220 — —
ENTYVIO
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $169
$169 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $163
$163 12 —
STELARA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $143
$143 — —
CREON
  • AbbVie, Inc. $138
$138 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

522 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record