Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Butler

Spokane, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1700956620 CMS profile 168223

105 W 8Th Ave, Ste 6080, Spokane, WA 99204

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,192

179 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$504,108 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Butler of Spokane, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,192 across 179 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $504,108 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $300 13
2024 General $710 32
2023 General $605 25
2022 General $193 11
2021 General $14 1
2020 General $188 11
2019 General $1,182 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Butler
  • Washington median
  • Middle half of Washington
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Butler were reported at $300. Among 15,799 Washington profiles paid that year, the median was $133 and the middle half received between $42 and $442.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Butler Washington median Middle half National median
2019 $1,182 $126 $38–$506 $163
2020 $188 $90 $30–$291 $114
2021 $14 $107 $29–$344 $132
2022 $193 $124 $38–$398 $149
2023 $605 $129 $40–$423 $160
2024 $710 $133 $44–$454 $164
2025 $300 $133 $42–$442 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,304 52 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $440 32 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $351 33 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $290 18 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $237 14 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $207 14 payments
  7. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $123 1 payment
  8. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $78 5 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $44 2 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $30 2 payments
  11. Other $88 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,192 179 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,253 50 payments
  2. Rituxan $440 32 payments
  3. Actemra $440 32 payments
  4. KRYSTEXXA $264 17 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $207 14 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $182 24 payments
  7. COSENTYX $169 9 payments
  8. Otezla $143 8 payments
  9. Enbrel Inflammation $127 7 payments
  10. EUFLEXXA $78 5 payments
  11. Other $418 26 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

1,684

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,333,415

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 39 $303,837
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 26 $233,325
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 19 $156,050
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 21 $115,574
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 15 $109,521
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 16 $103,659
Otezla Apremilast Brand 21 $102,554
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $92,200
Simponi Golimumab Brand 13 $78,363
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 214 $10,161

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 81 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$413,002

Of which drugs: $361,005

Medicare patients

348

Average age 73

Services billed

26,404

259 women, 89 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Osteoporosis 41%
Depression 28%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 22 3,407 $85,582
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 28 1,680 $31,687
Hyaluronan or derivative, synvisc or synvisc-one, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7325 Office 13 864 $5,917
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 49 262 $163

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $516
$516 16 —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $92
$92 12 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $40
$40 21 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $40
$40 45 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

179 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record