Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2023–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jazmine Porterfield

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Columbia, SC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1235881772 CMS profile 11322268

8 Richland Medical Park Dr Ste 300, Columbia, SC 29203

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,276

208 records reported · program years 2023–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2023–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jazmine Porterfield of Columbia, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,276 across 208 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,729 85
2024 General $2,252 106
2023 General $296 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jazmine Porterfield
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jazmine Porterfield were reported at $1,729. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Jazmine Porterfield Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $0 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $0 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $296 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $2,252 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $1,729 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $607 28 payments
  2. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $506 19 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $473 26 payments
  4. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $360 16 payments
  5. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $340 9 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $228 14 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $197 10 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $189 17 payments
  9. Inari Medical, Inc. $179 1 payment
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $157 9 payments
  11. Other $1,040 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,276 208 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. ONPATTRO $360 16 payments
  2. LEQVIO $349 17 payments
  3. LifeVest $340 9 payments
  4. (CK4) MCOT $308 12 payments
  5. VERQUVO $297 15 payments
  6. ENTRESTO $297 13 payments
  7. VYNDAQEL $250 13 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $223 13 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $198 12 payments
  10. CT THROMBECTOMY SYSTEM KIT $179 1 payment
  11. Other $2,092 112 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,989

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$381,812

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

24.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 198 $229,022
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 39 $42,965
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 33 $26,220
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $22,024
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 16 $18,381
Nexlizet Bempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe Brand 15 $13,854
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 251 $4,439
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 31 $2,676
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 180 $2,617
Losartan Potassium Generic 184 $2,202

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$11,381

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

177

Average age 77

Services billed

275

127 women, 50 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Ischemic heart disease 54%
Atrial fibrillation 40%
Heart failure 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 27%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $200
$200 39 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $175
$175 — —
VYNDAQEL
  • PFIZER INC. $133
$133 — —
ONPATTRO
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $114
$114 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $112
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

208 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record