Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jay Patel

Nephrology Greensboro, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1013034727 CMS profile 591126

309 New St, Carolina Kidney Associates, Greensboro, NC 27405

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,505

510 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jay Patel of Greensboro, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,505 across 510 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,975 87
2024 General $1,331 57
2023 General $3,756 83
2022 General $14,810 115
2021 General $1,379 66
2020 General $2,173 39
2019 General $1,081 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jay Patel
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jay Patel were reported at $1,975. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Jay Patel Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,081 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $2,173 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $1,379 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $14,810 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $3,756 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $1,331 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $1,975 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $15,540 38 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,699 19 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,411 80 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,066 33 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $998 55 payments
  6. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $872 43 payments
  7. Relypsa, Inc. $709 39 payments
  8. Retrophin, Inc. $578 27 payments
  9. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $457 16 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $391 23 payments
  11. Other $2,784 137 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14,621 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $10,141 491 payments
  3. Honoraria $1,328 1 payment
  4. Education $332 9 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $58 1 payment
  6. Consulting Fee $26 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $15,540 38 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA $1,669 18 payments
  3. ACTHAR $1,045 31 payments
  4. LOKELMA $783 45 payments
  5. JYNARQUE $683 31 payments
  6. FARXIGA $650 36 payments
  7. Parsabiv $405 18 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $372 22 payments
  9. TAVNEOS $358 17 payments
  10. Veltassa $329 17 payments
  11. Other $4,325 215 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,597

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$486,847

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jynarque Tolvaptan Brand 13 $246,071
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 126 $89,827
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 15 $44,744
Auryxia Ferric Citrate Brand 14 $30,308
Veltassa Patiromer Calcium Sorbitex Brand 23 $19,624
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 16 $17,914
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 27 $15,519
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 37 $6,988
Cinacalcet Hcl Generic 18 $1,340
Torsemide Generic 47 $1,275

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$143,317

Of which drugs: $165

Medicare patients

296

Average age 68

Services billed

1,511

147 women, 149 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 65%
Heart failure 50%
Ischemic heart disease 47%
Arthritis 39%
Atrial fibrillation 29%
Depression 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 46 446 $47
Injection, fentanyl citrate, 0.1 mg J3010 Office 26 53 $30
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 25 62 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TARPEYO
  • CALLIDITAS THERAPEUTICS US INC. $167
$167 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $161
$161 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $98
$98 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $92
$92 — —
JYNARQUE
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $92
$92 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

510 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record