Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jay Lutins

Urology Pittsburgh, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1396740163 CMS profile 18053

1145 Bower Hill Rd Ste 105, Pittsburgh, PA 15243

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,894

422 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jay Lutins of Pittsburgh, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,894 across 422 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $903 44
2024 General $1,333 58
2023 General $1,554 65
2022 General $1,041 52
2021 General $1,188 56
2020 General $924 44
2019 General $1,951 103

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jay Lutins
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jay Lutins were reported at $903. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Jay Lutins Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,951 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $924 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $1,188 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $1,041 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $1,554 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $1,333 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $903 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,383 28 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,367 81 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $972 62 payments
  4. Medtronic USA, Inc. $685 17 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $518 27 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $452 11 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $331 21 payments
  8. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $329 25 payments
  9. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $264 14 payments
  10. Antares Pharma, Inc. $247 14 payments
  11. Other $2,345 122 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,894 422 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XTANDI $2,064 127 payments
  2. ORGOVYX Oncology $936 53 payments
  3. MYRBETRIQ $622 43 payments
  4. VERIFY $537 9 payments
  5. INTERSTIM $452 11 payments
  6. AMS 700 $394 4 payments
  7. TALZENNA $379 20 payments
  8. ERLEADA $350 23 payments
  9. ORGOVYX Hormone Therapy $342 30 payments
  10. LUPRON DEPOT $305 18 payments
  11. Other $5,297 251 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

2,191

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$86,694

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

25.1%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 117 $60,073
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 730 $7,777
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 16 $5,560
Desmopressin Acetate Generic 42 $2,123
Methenamine Hippurate Generic 67 $1,731
Nitrofurantoin Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal Brand 102 $1,583
Finasteride Generic 173 $1,524
Oxybutynin Chloride Er Oxybutynin Chloride Brand 72 $1,366
Silodosin Generic 17 $979
Cefpodoxime Proxetil Generic 48 $939

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$144,459

Of which drugs: $15,425

Medicare patients

683

Average age 75

Services billed

2,987

124 women, 559 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Cancer 27%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 12 102 $14,049

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XTANDI
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $129
  • PFIZER INC. $47
$176 — —
ORGOVYX
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $90
  • PFIZER INC. $47
$137 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $70
$70 — —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $53
$53 — —
Nubeqa
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $40
$40 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

422 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record