Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jay Berman

Gynecology Southfield, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1710924238 CMS profile 213263

26400 W 12 Mile Rd, Suite 140, Southfield, MI 48034

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$217,942

341 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$9,600

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$381,763 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Jay Berman of Southfield, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $217,942 across 341 general payments and $9,600 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $381,763 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Gynecology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,322 34
2025 Research $9,600 1
2024 General $18,664 40
2023 General $46,326 50
2022 General $27,305 38
2021 General $41,793 36
2020 General $9,430 26
2019 General $66,103 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jay Berman
  • Gynecology median
  • Middle half of Gynecology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jay Berman were reported at $8,322. Among 1,279 Gynecology profiles paid that year, the median was $162 and the middle half received between $56 and $501.

Show as a table
Year Jay Berman Gynecology median Middle half National median
2019 $66,103 $199 $66–$472 $163
2020 $9,430 $114 $42–$287 $114
2021 $41,793 $141 $42–$430 $132
2022 $27,305 $173 $52–$532 $149
2023 $46,326 $170 $57–$501 $160
2024 $18,664 $157 $50–$424 $164
2025 $8,322 $162 $56–$501 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acessa Health Inc. $64,042 28 payments
  2. Hologic, LLC $36,194 55 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $29,038 58 payments
  4. Lupin Inc. $26,874 26 payments
  5. Gynesonics, Inc. $16,876 18 payments
  6. Organon LLC $8,583 17 payments
  7. Acessa Health Inc. $7,371 12 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $7,064 17 payments
  9. Covidien LP $5,998 18 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $4,928 25 payments
  11. Other $10,974 67 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $121,145 57 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $62,215 28 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $15,053 51 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $11,146 194 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $8,383 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACESSA PROVU SYSTEM Surgical $70,620 59 payments
  2. SOLOSEC $26,861 25 payments
  3. Orilissa $21,272 41 payments
  4. ACESSA PROVU SYSTEM Surgical $15,146 6 payments
  5. SONATA SONOGRAPHY-GUIDED TRANSCERVICAL FIBROID ABLATION SYSTEM $12,582 9 payments
  6. NEXPLANON Etonogestrel $8,476 16 payments
  7. Acessa $7,371 12 payments
  8. NEXPLANON Womens Health $7,064 17 payments
  9. ORIAHNN $6,105 9 payments
  10. TruClear $5,998 18 payments
  11. Other $24,482 142 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $9,600 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 4 drugs

Part D claims

85

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 65

Drug cost

$13,528

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: $3,585

Branded share of claims

44.7%

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 25.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Estradiol Generic 47 $7,902
Yuvafem Estradiol Brand 14 $3,050
Estradiol (Twice Weekly) Estradiol Brand 11 $1,440
Estradiol-Norethindrone Acetat Estradiol/Norethindrone Acet Brand 13 $1,137

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 24,311 Part D prescribers listed as Obstetrics & Gynecology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,317

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

49

Average age 64

Services billed

71

49 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 39%
Heart failure 22%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 0%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $153
$153 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $122
$122 — —
Mirena
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $117
$117 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

342 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Gynecology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record