Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jason Wolff

Interventional Pain Medicine Maple Grove, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1376759845 CMS profile 17557

9645 Grove Cir N Ste 200, Maple Grove, MN 55369

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,604

148 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$73,984 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Jason Wolff of Maple Grove, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,604 across 148 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $73,984 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $408 14
2024 General $329 8
2023 General $424 8
2022 General $2,825 27
2021 General $2,561 26
2020 General $969 31
2019 General $1,087 34

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jason Wolff
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Wolff were reported at $408. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Jason Wolff Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,087 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $969 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $2,561 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $2,825 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $424 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $329 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $408 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $4,104 22 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $992 30 payments
  3. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $830 9 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $629 19 payments
  5. Medtronic USA, Inc. $466 23 payments
  6. SI-BONE, Inc. $413 5 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $412 9 payments
  8. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $333 11 payments
  9. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $175 4 payments
  10. Vertos Medical, Inc. $49 2 payments
  11. Other $201 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,471 141 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,600 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $521 4 payments
  4. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $2,019 7 payments
  2. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $1,824 6 payments
  3. Intracept Pain $491 5 payments
  4. Omnia $453 9 payments
  5. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $428 21 payments
  6. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $411 16 payments
  7. Intracept Pain $338 4 payments
  8. Intracept Pain $338 4 payments
  9. Intracept Pain $338 4 payments
  10. Intracept Pain $338 4 payments
  11. Other $2,474 78 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

338

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$3,913

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

3.3%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gabapentin Generic 111 $1,581
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 56 $806
Methocarbamol Generic 21 $270
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 21 $263
Baclofen Generic 18 $235
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 29 $221
Methylprednisolone Generic 29 $179
Hydroxyzine Pamoate Generic 16 $149
Cephalexin Generic 14 $128
Amitriptyline Hcl Generic 12 $49

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$100,918

Of which drugs: $655

Medicare patients

351

Average age 70

Services billed

2,406

224 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 69%
Depression 43%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 14 881 $83
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 12 17 $77
Injection, propofol, 10 mg J2704 Office 17 270 $21
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 49 184 $19
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 32 57 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

148 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record