Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jason Rytlewski

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Columbia, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1104036029 CMS profile 186226

1605 East Broadway, #300, Columbia, MO 65201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,930

462 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,537 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Jason Rytlewski of Columbia, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,930 across 462 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,537 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 65th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,759 97
2024 General $7,739 69
2023 General $7,893 61
2022 General $5,193 107
2021 General $759 22
2020 General $463 16
2019 General $8,124 90

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jason Rytlewski
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Rytlewski were reported at $3,759. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Jason Rytlewski Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,124 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $463 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $759 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $5,193 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $7,893 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $7,739 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $3,759 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biotronik Inc. $19,005 110 payments
  2. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $5,564 56 payments
  3. Biosense Webster, Inc. $1,995 73 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $1,531 57 payments
  5. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $1,335 5 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,334 56 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $975 19 payments
  8. Atricure, Inc. $612 6 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $196 11 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $188 11 payments
  11. Other $1,194 58 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,441 423 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $7,645 30 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $6,200 3 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $5,543 4 payments
  5. Education $101 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TYRX $2,226 4 payments
  2. Carto 3 $2,217 58 payments
  3. BIOMONITOR Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $2,059 33 payments
  4. Acticor 7 VR-T DX $1,646 11 payments
  5. Rivacor 7 DR-T $1,516 11 payments
  6. BioMonitor Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $1,422 9 payments
  7. Solia $1,312 13 payments
  8. Edora 8 DR-T $1,270 7 payments
  9. OCTARAY MAPPING CATHETER $1,012 14 payments
  10. Advisa $816 29 payments
  11. Other $8,450 275 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,665

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$417,378

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

37.2%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 307 $260,042
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 91 $79,646
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 55 $58,912
Dofetilide Generic 24 $5,393
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 95 $2,030
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 70 $1,782
Carvedilol Generic 244 $1,309
Midodrine Hcl Generic 21 $1,007
Sotalol Sotalol Hcl Brand 64 $997
Bisoprolol Fumarate Generic 14 $946

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$219,424

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

737

Average age 77

Services billed

2,371

328 women, 409 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 66%
Arthritis 50%
Heart failure 47%
Ischemic heart disease 47%
Diabetes 37%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $66
$66 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $61
$61 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $41
  • PFIZER INC. $17
$58 307 —
WAINUA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $51
$51 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

462 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record