Who Paid My Doc
Jason Faller
New York, NY Medical Doctor
NPI 1558352740 CMS profile 69870
333 W 57Th St, Apt 104, New York, NY 10019
General payments
$357,037
Research payments
$2,619
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Jason Faller of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $357,037 across 1,763 general payments and $2,619 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
By program year
8 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $43,829 | 242 | |
| 2024 | General | $66,213 | 290 | |
| 2023 | General | $49,786 | 241 | |
| 2022 | General | $53,917 | 288 | |
| 2021 | General | $44,806 | 209 | |
| 2020 | General | $26,722 | 128 | |
| 2019 | General | $71,763 | 365 | |
| 2019 | Research | $2,619 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Jason Faller
- New York median
- Middle half of New York
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Faller were reported at $43,829. Among 69,423 New York profiles paid that year, the median was $180 and the middle half received between $58 and $640.
Show as a table
| Year | Jason Faller | New York median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $71,763 | $175 | $53–$665 | $163 |
| 2020 | $26,722 | $122 | $37–$426 | $114 |
| 2021 | $44,806 | $144 | $44–$514 | $132 |
| 2022 | $53,917 | $160 | $51–$578 | $149 |
| 2023 | $49,786 | $170 | $54–$593 | $160 |
| 2024 | $66,213 | $173 | $56–$618 | $164 |
| 2025 | $43,829 | $180 | $58–$640 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 66 drugsPart D claims
2,446
Drug cost
$2,021,452
Branded share of claims
31%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab | Brand | 64 | $623,462 | |
| Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept | Brand | 37 | $296,518 | |
| Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa | Brand | 14 | $292,877 | |
| Otezla Apremilast | Brand | 52 | $291,356 | |
| Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol | Brand | 18 | $161,434 | |
| Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl | Brand | 11 | $97,243 | |
| Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab | Brand | 13 | $93,684 | |
| Actemra Tocilizumab | Brand | 12 | $52,968 | |
| Mounjaro Tirzepatide | Brand | 20 | $20,685 | |
| Xarelto Rivaroxaban | Brand | 17 | $19,056 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 66 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$500,165
Medicare patients
343
Services billed
47,512
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis | 75% | |
| High blood pressure | 69% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 28% | |
| Osteoporosis | 28% | |
| Diabetes | 27% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 15% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 14% | |
| Cancer | 14% |
| Drug given in the clinic | Where | Patients | Services | Paid by Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 | Office | 20 | 1,800 | $35,850 |
| Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 | Office | 63 | 64 | $5,227 |
| Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 | Office | 12 | 12 | $3,431 |
| Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 | Office | 20 | 86 | $67 |
| Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 | Office | 20 | 116 | $59 |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Payments and prescribing
First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RINVOQ |
|
$19,060 | — | — |
| Otezla |
|
$15,904 | 52 | — |
| SKYRIZI |
|
$13,053 | 14 | — |
| ACTHAR |
|
$12,071 | — | — |
| Bimzelx |
|
$3,381 | — | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with PatronRecords
1,764 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Related records
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.