Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jason Darlington

Ophthalmology Melbourne, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1972598308 CMS profile 43839

1995 W. Nasa Blvd, Suite 200, Melbourne, FL 32904

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,191

136 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$4,002

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$329,614 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Jason Darlington of Melbourne, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,191 across 136 general payments and $4,002 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $329,614 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $969 38
2024 General $235 12
2023 General $449 26
2022 General $578 23
2021 General $390 19
2020 General $170 6
2020 Research $4,002 1
2019 General $400 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jason Darlington
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Darlington were reported at $969. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Jason Darlington Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $400 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $170 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $390 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $578 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $449 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $235 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $969 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $648 30 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $559 35 payments
  3. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $458 20 payments
  4. Glaukos Corporation $307 4 payments
  5. Nova Eye, Inc. $292 1 payment
  6. Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $204 9 payments
  7. Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. $112 2 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $104 5 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $83 6 payments
  10. Sight Sciences, Inc. $70 4 payments
  11. Other $355 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,191 136 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DURYSTA Eye Care $433 30 payments
  2. RayOne EMV $178 8 payments
  3. RayOne Aspheric $178 8 payments
  4. RayOne Spheric $178 8 payments
  5. Omidria $168 7 payments
  6. Clareon $95 4 payments
  7. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $95 5 payments
  8. Centurion $94 3 payments
  9. iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent System $94 1 payment
  10. DURYSTA Glaucoma $91 6 payments
  11. Other $2,072 112 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $4,002 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

5,255

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$502,890

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

50.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 53 $60,091
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 137 $54,435
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 91 $46,914
Tobramycin-Dexamethasone Tobramycin/Dexamethasone Brand 972 $43,113
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 75 $36,473
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 68 $35,570
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 21 $26,092
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 92 $24,316
Travoprost Generic 100 $19,376
Cyclosporine Generic 29 $17,762

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 70 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,192,373

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

2,497

Average age 76

Services billed

9,125

1,483 women, 1,014 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $46
$46 — —
IHEEZO
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $14
$14 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $11
$11 — —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $11
$11 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

137 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record