Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Janet Wieselthier

Dermatopathology Lyndhurst, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1639174386 CMS profile 73683

29001 Cedar Rd, Suite 203, Lyndhurst, OH 44124

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,006

105 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$21,565 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Janet Wieselthier of Lyndhurst, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,006 across 105 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $21,565 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 71st percentile of Dermatopathology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $305 12
2024 General $470 16
2023 General $585 20
2022 General $579 14
2021 General $253 10
2020 General $276 11
2019 General $538 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Janet Wieselthier
  • Dermatopathology median
  • Middle half of Dermatopathology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Janet Wieselthier were reported at $305. Among 238 Dermatopathology profiles paid that year, the median was $251 and the middle half received between $93 and $1,140.

Show as a table
Year Janet Wieselthier Dermatopathology median Middle half National median
2019 $538 $295 $101–$807 $163
2020 $276 $154 $53–$443 $114
2021 $253 $226 $66–$781 $132
2022 $579 $258 $76–$906 $149
2023 $585 $303 $93–$1,129 $160
2024 $470 $324 $101–$1,343 $164
2025 $305 $251 $93–$1,140 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,057 52 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $761 30 payments
  3. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $381 3 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $310 6 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $210 2 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $121 2 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $85 5 payments
  8. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $65 4 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $16 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,755 102 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $150 1 payment
  3. Education $101 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CIBINQO $525 24 payments
  2. LITFULO $516 20 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $478 28 payments
  4. RINVOQ $431 18 payments
  5. EUCRISA $310 17 payments
  6. HUMIRA $306 19 payments
  7. AKLIEF $231 2 payments
  8. TWYNEO $131 1 payment
  9. SOTYKTU $130 1 payment
  10. TREMFYA $121 2 payments
  11. Other $288 16 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

683

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$81,332

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

12%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 18 $66,813
Fluocinonide Generic 63 $2,432
Metronidazole Generic 17 $2,025
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 33 $1,348
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 182 $1,281
Fluorouracil Generic 15 $1,236
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 22 $811
Desonide Generic 17 $576
Ketoconazole Generic 26 $479
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 20 $418

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$84,837

Of which drugs: $33

Medicare patients

418

Average age 78

Services billed

2,136

267 women, 151 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 48%
Osteoporosis 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Cancer 21%
Diabetes 18%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 19 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LITFULO
  • PFIZER INC. $147
$147 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $57
$57 — —
EUCRISA
  • PFIZER INC. $57
$57 — —
OLUMIANT
  • Lilly USA, LLC $20
$20 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $15
$15 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

105 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatopathology in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record