Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2021–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jane Todd

General Practice Center, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1922021682 CMS profile 1215055

233 Hurst Street, Suite B, Center, TX 75935

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27

2 records reported · program years 2021–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Jane Todd of Center, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27 across 2 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 12th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $15 1
2021 General $12 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jane Todd
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jane Todd were reported at $0. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Jane Todd General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $0 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $12 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $0 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $15 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $0 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $0 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $15 1 payment
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $27 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. UBRELVY $15 1 payment
  2. Enspryng $12 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

855

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$41,086

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

8.9%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 11 $7,486
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 26 $7,337
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 25 $5,510
Entacapone Generic 13 $3,139
Levetiracetam Generic 14 $1,965
Gabapentin Generic 40 $1,481
Memantine Hcl Generic 28 $1,289
Methenamine Hippurate Generic 11 $1,196
Metoclopramide Hcl Generic 16 $1,014
Potassium Chloride Generic 42 $919

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$58,624

Of which drugs: $42,464

Medicare patients

275

Average age 76

Services billed

920

186 women, 89 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Depression 41%
Alzheimer's or dementia 38%
Diabetes 37%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Heart failure 25%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 167 167 $13,582
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 67 67 $10,236
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 57 58 $8,464
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 28 28 $8,178
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 15 15 $542

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

2 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record