Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jamie Brewer

Nurse Practitioner, Family Florence, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1154733392 CMS profile 851544

2785 Highway 49 S Ste B, Florence, MS 39073

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,602

466 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jamie Brewer of Florence, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,602 across 466 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,276 110
2024 General $1,682 100
2023 General $1,419 80
2022 General $1,029 72
2021 General $2,178 103
2020 General $19 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jamie Brewer
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jamie Brewer were reported at $2,276. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Jamie Brewer Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $19 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $2,178 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $1,029 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $1,419 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $1,682 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,276 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $1,241 64 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $758 49 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $551 39 payments
  4. Dexcom, Inc. $549 25 payments
  5. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $488 24 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $483 26 payments
  7. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $460 28 payments
  8. Zealand Pharma US, Inc. $433 4 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $407 25 payments
  10. Corcept Therapeutics $384 24 payments
  11. Other $2,848 158 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,119 462 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $400 1 payment
  3. Gift $59 1 payment
  4. Education $24 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. FreeStyle Libre $551 39 payments
  2. Kerendia $483 26 payments
  3. NEXLETOL $460 28 payments
  4. Ozempic $441 31 payments
  5. LYUMJEV $422 12 payments
  6. ZEGALOGUE $418 3 payments
  7. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $416 17 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $410 29 payments
  9. FARXIGA $407 25 payments
  10. Korlym $384 24 payments
  11. Other $5,449 323 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 92 drugs

Part D claims

6,126

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$2,603,210

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

49%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 191 $253,933
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5) Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/7 Brand 168 $241,561
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 190 $240,358
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 178 $181,836
Humulin R U-500 Kwikpen Insulin Regular, Human Brand 50 $167,461
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 175 $154,249
Fiasp Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 74 $140,882
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 100 $116,157
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 85 $97,917
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 78 $92,560

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 92 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$145,329

Of which drugs: $25,731

Medicare patients

261

Average age 71

Services billed

7,412

152 women, 109 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Depression 24%
Osteoporosis 20%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 1,201 $25,730

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RECORLEV
  • Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $135
$135 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $89
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $33
$122 178 —
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $95
$95 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $95
$95 191 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $92
$92 190 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

466 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record