Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Thompson

Internal Medicine Debary, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1881666790 CMS profile 220937

190 N Charles Richard Beall Blvd, Debary, FL 32713

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,118

653 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Thompson of Debary, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,118 across 653 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,848 107
2024 General $986 62
2023 General $2,019 129
2022 General $1,416 79
2021 General $1,498 80
2020 General $1,048 79
2019 General $2,303 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Thompson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Thompson were reported at $1,848. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Thompson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,303 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,048 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,498 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,416 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,019 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $986 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,848 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,573 60 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,468 112 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,456 90 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $770 49 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $642 42 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $525 29 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $406 27 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $390 19 payments
  9. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $385 17 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $297 10 payments
  11. Other $3,205 198 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,118 653 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $815 40 payments
  2. Ozempic $633 45 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $582 33 payments
  4. ELIQUIS $500 26 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $479 31 payments
  6. QULIPTA $415 34 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $411 32 payments
  8. LINZESS $390 24 payments
  9. UBRELVY $352 28 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $347 20 payments
  11. Other $9,805 600 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 202 drugs

Part D claims

16,117

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,219,684

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 206 $213,660
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 76 $83,475
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 66 $79,750
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $71,602
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 90 $60,177
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 61 $50,209
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 46 $49,669
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 43 $45,675
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 62 $43,371
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 54 $35,188

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 202 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$117,872

Of which drugs: $14,078

Medicare patients

371

Average age 74

Services billed

2,426

161 women, 210 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 20%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 27 27 $7,776
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 72 72 $5,809

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $87
$87 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $83
$83 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $69
$69 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $63
$63 19 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $59
$59 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

653 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record