Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Salmon

Internal Medicine Fayetteville, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1235175225 CMS profile 237861

3344 N Futrall Dr, Fayetteville, AR 72703

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,657

263 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, James Salmon of Fayetteville, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,657 across 263 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $559 34
2023 General $487 32
2022 General $549 36
2021 General $693 52
2020 General $842 67
2019 General $527 42

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Salmon
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Salmon were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Salmon Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $527 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $842 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $693 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $549 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $487 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $559 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $820 69 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $624 38 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $428 27 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $364 30 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $188 15 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $152 13 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $123 7 payments
  8. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $120 8 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $101 6 payments
  10. Dexcom, Inc. $77 6 payments
  11. Other $660 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $3,657 263 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $604 49 payments
  2. UBRELVY $464 28 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $295 25 payments
  4. ZAVZPRET $249 19 payments
  5. FARXIGA $240 12 payments
  6. Ozempic $165 14 payments
  7. SYMBICORT $164 10 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $123 7 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $115 10 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $110 6 payments
  11. Other $2,041 152 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 170 drugs

Part D claims

13,679

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$733,629

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 166 $176,729
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 107 $119,410
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 46 $45,016
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 32 $33,735
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 34 $32,920
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 35 $30,672
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 41 $29,725
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 17 $22,720
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 32 $15,916
Synjardy Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 12 $12,750

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 170 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 162 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$156,287

Of which drugs: $8,302

Medicare patients

663

Average age 76

Services billed

28,312

415 women, 248 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 44 46 $3,744
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 50 8,560 $858
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 33 67 $359
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 32 3,488 $344
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 15 63 $53

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $85
$85 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $85
$85 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $56
$56 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $46
$46 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $46
$46 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

263 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record