Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Murray

Dermatology Coos Bay, OR Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1861050189 CMS profile 6977201

1900 Woodland Dr, Coos Bay, OR 97420

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,150

113 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Murray of Coos Bay, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,150 across 113 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 47th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $295 10
2024 General $435 22
2023 General $570 32
2022 General $722 43
2021 General $129 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Murray
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Murray were reported at $295. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year James Murray Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $0 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $129 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $722 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $570 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $435 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $295 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $820 52 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $691 28 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $284 16 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $117 5 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $44 2 payments
  6. Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc. $36 2 payments
  7. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $36 2 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $28 1 payment
  9. Henry Schein, Inc. $25 1 payment
  10. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $19 1 payment
  11. Other $50 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,142 112 payments
  2. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TALTZ $511 25 payments
  2. SKYRIZI Immunology $391 31 payments
  3. RINVOQ $267 14 payments
  4. OLUMIANT $247 12 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $222 13 payments
  6. STELARA $222 13 payments
  7. REMICADE $222 13 payments
  8. SIMPONI $222 13 payments
  9. SKYRIZI Immunology $153 6 payments
  10. EBGLYSS $145 5 payments
  11. Other $494 25 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

913

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$306,499

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

9.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 15 $286,975
Fluocinonide Generic 86 $4,907
Ketoconazole Generic 146 $3,036
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 184 $2,391
Fluorouracil Generic 30 $1,905
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 34 $1,667
Metronidazole Generic 18 $1,057
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 39 $794
Nystatin Generic 49 $726
Hydrocortisone Generic 85 $702

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$222,933

Of which drugs: $38,037

Medicare patients

902

Average age 75

Services billed

5,217

431 women, 471 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 20%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 58 124 $35,809
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 43 57 $128
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 35 110 $80

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $116
$116 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $91
$91 15 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $62
$62 — —
OLUMIANT
  • Lilly USA, LLC $49
$49 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $44
$44 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

113 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Oregon

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record