Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Lin

Geriatric Medicine Erie, PA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1164599155 CMS profile 143379

5401 Peach St Ste 3400, Erie, PA 16509

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$72,963

362 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Lin of Erie, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $72,963 across 362 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $18,186 90
2024 General $28,417 86
2023 General $22,590 63
2022 General $2,217 34
2021 General $685 34
2020 General $246 15
2019 General $622 40

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Lin
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Lin were reported at $18,186. Among 1,028 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $123 and the middle half received between $35 and $408.

Show as a table
Year James Lin Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $622 $122 $40–$435 $163
2020 $246 $98 $25–$349 $114
2021 $685 $125 $34–$441 $132
2022 $2,217 $124 $36–$408 $149
2023 $22,590 $121 $41–$383 $160
2024 $28,417 $134 $41–$435 $164
2025 $18,186 $123 $35–$408 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Reapplix Inc. $32,326 28 payments
  2. Organogenesis Inc. $29,480 54 payments
  3. Merz North America, Inc. $4,150 47 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,086 3 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $750 7 payments
  6. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $691 27 payments
  7. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $570 21 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $346 15 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $322 17 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $253 16 payments
  11. Other $2,990 127 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $44,852 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $9,850 320 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $8,250 2 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $5,750 2 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $4,141 19 payments
  6. Education $120 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. 3C Patch Kit - Box $32,326 28 payments
  2. PURAPLY WOUND MATRIX $13,933 23 payments
  3. Affinity $6,346 8 payments
  4. Puraply $5,400 11 payments
  5. Puraply Antimicrobial $4,650 4 payments
  6. Xeomin $3,942 42 payments
  7. Varithena Administration Pack $1,086 3 payments
  8. APLIGRAF $1,082 2 payments
  9. NuShield $1,050 1 payment
  10. NOVACHOR $1,050 1 payment
  11. Other $5,683 254 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 197 drugs

Part D claims

13,786

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 2,306

Drug cost

$1,054,480

Median for Geriatric Medicine: $150,713

Branded share of claims

20.5%

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 16.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 324 $184,634
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 28 $85,301
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 129 $72,934
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 67 $66,856
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $50,067
Arexvy Rsvpref3 Antigen/As01e/Pf Brand 135 $39,685
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 33 $34,127
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 80 $33,758
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 27 $30,922
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 48 $29,560

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 197 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,814 Part D prescribers listed as Geriatric Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 82 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$998,720

Of which drugs: $818,805

Medicare patients

331

Average age 77

Services billed

3,787

211 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Diabetes 42%
Depression 42%
Heart failure 40%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Alzheimer's or dementia 34%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 840 $16,236

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Xeomin
  • MERZ NORTH AMERICA, INC. $3,249
$3,249 — —
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $109
$109 — —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $50
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $36
$86 27 —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $34
$34 — —
KISUNLA
  • Lilly USA, LLC $34
$34 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

362 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record