Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Lin

Internal Medicine Arcadia, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1881789600 CMS profile 175790

224 S Santa Anita Ave, Arcadia, CA 91006

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,370

651 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Lin of Arcadia, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,370 across 651 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,441 49
2024 General $2,987 61
2023 General $3,900 102
2022 General $3,490 104
2021 General $4,520 171
2020 General $1,672 82
2019 General $2,359 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Lin
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Lin were reported at $2,441. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Lin Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,359 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,672 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,520 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,490 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,900 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,987 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,441 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,442 71 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,168 59 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,868 52 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,728 67 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,261 49 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,102 33 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $951 32 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $918 53 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $809 27 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $650 36 payments
  11. Other $6,473 172 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,005 640 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $231 3 payments
  3. Education $119 7 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $2,580 58 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,354 49 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $912 40 payments
  4. EVENITY $870 24 payments
  5. Kerendia $809 27 payments
  6. Repatha $807 24 payments
  7. UBRELVY $800 32 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $793 32 payments
  9. Vascepa $779 43 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $737 13 payments
  11. Other $15,855 556 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 95 drugs

Part D claims

5,674

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$741,429

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 148 $130,455
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 76 $100,113
Prolia Denosumab Brand 51 $83,984
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 52 $69,284
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 30 $38,179
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 73 $35,142
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 30 $33,209
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 20 $32,613
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 18 $28,543
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 35 $28,496

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 95 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$149,792

Of which drugs: $13,150

Medicare patients

225

Average age 76

Services billed

1,836

125 women, 100 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 44%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Arthritis 31%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Osteoporosis 26%
Cancer 13%
COPD 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 64 64 $5,236
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 24 24 $1,964
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 48 48 $1,733

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $600
$600 148 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $439
$439 — —
ZENPEP
  • AIMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. $250
$250 — —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $244
$244 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $179
$179 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

651 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record