Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Hall

Internal Medicine Brookhaven, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1871518597 CMS profile 129729

747 Industrial Park Rd Ne, Brookhaven, MS 39601

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,245

107 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$540,546

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,822,694 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, James Hall of Brookhaven, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,245 across 107 general payments and $540,546 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,822,694 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $524 24
2024 General $773 33
2023 General $280 16
2023 Research $36 2
2022 General $287 18
2022 Research $111,960 2
2021 General $122 8
2021 Research $428,550 2
2020 General $202 5
2019 General $57 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Hall
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Hall were reported at $524. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Hall Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $57 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $202 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $122 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $287 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $280 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $773 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $524 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $413 25 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $336 18 payments
  3. Ardelyx, Inc. $303 10 payments
  4. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $187 5 payments
  5. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $165 10 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $148 5 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $93 5 payments
  8. Retrophin, Inc. $80 5 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $74 4 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $62 1 payment
  11. Other $382 19 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,099 101 payments
  2. Education $147 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $413 25 payments
  2. FARXIGA $229 12 payments
  3. JYNARQUE $187 5 payments
  4. IBSRELA $157 8 payments
  5. XPHOZAH 30 MG $147 2 payments
  6. Auryxia $141 9 payments
  7. Fabhalta $117 4 payments
  8. LOKELMA $108 6 payments
  9. Vanrafia $88 3 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $74 4 payments
  11. Other $602 30 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $540,546 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 47 drugs

Part D claims

1,624

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$400,064

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

20%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 41 $99,238
Xphozah Tenapanor Hcl Brand 25 $91,080
Auryxia Ferric Citrate Brand 61 $88,559
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 32 $31,198
Renvela Sevelamer Carbonate Brand 19 $25,145
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $23,121
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 124 $9,457
Lanthanum Carbonate Generic 16 $8,932
Cinacalcet Hcl Generic 16 $8,486
Calcium Acetate Generic 29 $2,211

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 47 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$220,628

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

366

Average age 71

Services billed

1,706

210 women, 156 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 60%
Arthritis 49%
Heart failure 42%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Depression 30%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XPHOZAH 30 MG
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $125
$125 25 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $121
$121 24 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $110
$110 32 —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $99
$99 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $58
$58 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

113 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record