Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Fosnaugh

Internal Medicine Lincoln, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1205865631 CMS profile 711300

7441 O St, Ste 400, Lincoln, NE 68510

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,713

165 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Fosnaugh of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,713 across 165 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $249 12
2024 General $508 27
2023 General $462 24
2022 General $460 30
2021 General $430 33
2020 General $443 27
2019 General $162 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Fosnaugh
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Fosnaugh were reported at $249. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Fosnaugh Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $162 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $443 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $430 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $460 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $462 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $508 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $249 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $401 25 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $306 20 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $237 19 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $222 16 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $188 7 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $157 7 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $135 8 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $118 8 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $86 5 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $80 6 payments
  11. Other $781 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,693 164 payments
  2. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $389 24 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $376 23 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $174 10 payments
  4. Veozah $155 5 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $143 11 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $134 12 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $126 8 payments
  8. FARXIGA $122 7 payments
  9. QULIPTA $122 5 payments
  10. XIFAXAN $118 8 payments
  11. Other $2,061 131 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 133 drugs

Part D claims

7,231

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$563,048

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 145 $182,302
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 117 $80,421
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 80 $64,877
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 29 $33,809
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 23 $22,875
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 20 $20,076
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 12 $12,534
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 14 $8,453
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 11 $7,104
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 12 $6,956

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 133 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 78 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$142,177

Of which drugs: $18,928

Medicare patients

842

Average age 76

Services billed

14,127

476 women, 366 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 66%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 32%
Heart failure 31%
Depression 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 39 40 $11,591
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 83 85 $6,905
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 27 174 $124

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $44
  • Lilly USA, LLC $34
$78 145 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $64
$64 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $58
$58 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $26
$26 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

165 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record