Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Branch

Ophthalmology Mocksville, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1538147061 CMS profile 342220

223 Hospital St, Mocksville, NC 27028

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,739

56 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$341,154

Paid to them · 80 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$935,391 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, James Branch of Mocksville, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,739 across 56 general payments and $341,154 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $935,391 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $133 5
2024 General $127 5
2023 General $18 1
2022 General $149 4
2022 Research $69,496 11
2021 General $203 10
2020 General $273 16
2020 Research $168,484 36
2019 General $1,836 15
2019 Research $103,175 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Branch
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Branch were reported at $133. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year James Branch Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,836 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $273 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $203 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $149 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $18 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $127 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $133 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Perrigo Company plc $1,554 3 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $565 25 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $151 5 payments
  4. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $98 5 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $85 4 payments
  6. Eyevance Pharmaceuticals LLC $79 4 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $66 3 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $61 3 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $23 1 payment
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $21 1 payment
  11. Other $35 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,580 50 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,041 2 payments
  3. Education $98 3 payments
  4. Gift $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $211 10 payments
  2. DURYSTA $188 10 payments
  3. LUMIGAN Eye Care $127 4 payments
  4. VUITY $106 2 payments
  5. INVELTYS $98 5 payments
  6. TEPEZZA Tepezza $85 4 payments
  7. Flarex $79 4 payments
  8. EYSUVIS $66 3 payments
  9. TEPEZZA Inflammation/Rare Disease $66 3 payments
  10. RESTASIS $46 2 payments
  11. Other $195 10 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $298,980 73 payments
  2. Shire North American Group Inc $40,728 6 payments
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,446 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

3,935

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$549,780

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

35.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 148 $116,168
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 160 $72,544
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 137 $67,329
Fluorometholone Generic 671 $64,212
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 103 $49,286
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 116 $41,362
Lotemax Sm Loteprednol Etabonate Brand 104 $33,011
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 157 $25,209
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 179 $10,822
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 236 $9,694

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$27,975

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

148

Average age 74

Services billed

436

92 women, 56 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 48%
Arthritis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Depression 25%
Heart failure 14%
Ischemic heart disease 14%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $65
$65 103 —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $42
$42 — —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $20
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

136 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record