Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Bailey

Family Medicine Bridgeport, WV Medical Doctor

NPI 1912933995 CMS profile 222288

120 Medical Park Dr Ste 300, Bridgeport, WV 26330

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,934

295 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Bailey of Bridgeport, WV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,934 across 295 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $660 44
2024 General $847 49
2023 General $1,042 74
2022 General $1,088 62
2021 General $512 30
2020 General $334 16
2019 General $452 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Bailey
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Bailey were reported at $660. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year James Bailey Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $452 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $334 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $512 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,088 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,042 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $847 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $660 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,103 71 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $948 25 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $778 61 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $425 25 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $316 24 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $184 13 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $170 6 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $139 15 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $120 7 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $114 6 payments
  11. Other $638 42 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,934 295 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $579 49 payments
  2. UBRELVY $533 31 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $499 43 payments
  4. QULIPTA $358 18 payments
  5. BREZTRI $313 8 payments
  6. FARXIGA $277 8 payments
  7. Otezla $240 19 payments
  8. LINZESS $191 20 payments
  9. Kerendia $170 6 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $163 2 payments
  11. Other $3,448 214 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 157 drugs

Part D claims

9,677

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$675,114

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 97 $93,598
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 74 $93,036
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 42 $57,449
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 39 $54,676
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 30 $48,442
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 35 $47,674
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 23 $29,925
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 18 $27,219
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 14 $23,625
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 24 $20,164

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 157 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$105,877

Of which drugs: $6,438

Medicare patients

278

Average age 74

Services billed

1,831

136 women, 142 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
COPD 20%
Heart failure 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 35 35 $2,864

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $132
$132 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $89
$89 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $68
$68 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $68
$68 42 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $55
$55 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

295 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in West Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record