Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jamal Saleh

Dermatology Whittier, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1316478498 CMS profile 8890756

12462 Putnam St Ste 501, Whittier, CA 90602

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$187,467

875 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jamal Saleh of Whittier, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $187,467 across 875 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $138,178 454
2024 General $44,995 290
2023 General $3,922 99
2022 General $345 31
2021 General $27 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jamal Saleh
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jamal Saleh were reported at $138,178. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Jamal Saleh Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $0 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $27 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $345 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,922 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $44,995 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $138,178 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $82,615 112 payments
  2. LEO Pharma Inc. $28,322 105 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $24,918 161 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $20,265 60 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $11,122 34 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,405 46 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $4,182 40 payments
  8. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $3,533 44 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $2,833 36 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $862 26 payments
  11. Other $4,408 211 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $122,532 37 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $38,458 20 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $22,378 783 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,572 28 payments
  5. Education $528 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Bimzelx $82,615 112 payments
  2. RINVOQ $22,393 93 payments
  3. ADBRY $20,629 80 payments
  4. NEMLUVIO $19,312 33 payments
  5. ANZUPGO $7,490 22 payments
  6. COSENTYX $7,095 23 payments
  7. TREMFYA $4,971 51 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $4,164 40 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $2,216 48 payments
  10. Zoryve $991 36 payments
  11. Other $7,017 356 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,577

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$470,392

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 74 $277,371
Otezla Apremilast Brand 11 $80,807
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 13 $48,309
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 17 $13,790
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 207 $10,145
Tacrolimus Generic 66 $9,466
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 91 $3,756
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 99 $3,601
Ketoconazole Generic 189 $2,745
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 113 $2,475

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$80,946

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

238

Average age 74

Services billed

1,228

96 women, 142 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Cancer 18%
Osteoporosis 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ADBRY
$9,415 13 —
RINVOQ
$9,213 — —
Bimzelx
$8,568 — —
COSENTYX
$6,611 — —
SKYRIZI
$1,879 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

875 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record