Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jamaal El-Khal

General Practice Oroville, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1912161324 CMS profile 267955

2800 Lincoln Blvd, Oroville, CA 95966

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,553

386 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jamaal El-Khal of Oroville, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,553 across 386 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $852 43
2024 General $902 46
2023 General $1,157 56
2022 General $1,605 82
2021 General $1,848 104
2020 General $286 19
2019 General $902 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jamaal El-Khal
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jamaal El-Khal were reported at $852. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Jamaal El-Khal General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $902 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $286 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $1,848 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,605 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,157 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $902 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $852 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,869 114 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $669 56 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $574 25 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $561 17 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $413 23 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $362 16 payments
  7. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $275 21 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $259 15 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $230 8 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $208 11 payments
  11. Other $2,132 80 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,546 385 payments
  2. Education $7 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $756 49 payments
  2. XIFAXAN $669 56 payments
  3. CREON $574 33 payments
  4. Ozempic $445 16 payments
  5. LINZESS $407 23 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $351 15 payments
  7. MAVYRET $270 14 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $259 13 payments
  9. LONHALA MAGNAIR $255 20 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $222 10 payments
  11. Other $4,711 222 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 188 drugs

Part D claims

11,211

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$1,101,292

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 128 $165,893
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 86 $140,275
Trijardy Xr Empaglifloz/Linaglip/Metformin Brand 60 $85,385
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 51 $75,066
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 43 $62,592
Glyxambi Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Brand 38 $46,185
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 27 $43,827
Synjardy Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 27 $34,464
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 22 $33,251
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 24 $31,346

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 188 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$532,994

Of which drugs: $23,879

Medicare patients

672

Average age 77

Services billed

23,621

353 women, 319 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Osteoporosis 27%
Depression 24%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 228 229 $18,727
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 14 14,720 $247
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 68 125 $109
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 22 132 $98
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 28 114 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CREON
  • AbbVie, Inc. $184
$184 — —
INJECTAFER
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $152
$152 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $96
$96 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $56
$56 — —
LINZESS
  • AbbVie, Inc. $46
$46 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

386 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record