Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jade Klingler

Nurse Practitioner, Family Sturgis, MI Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1942636832 CMS profile 10727940

104 S Lakeview Ave, Sturgis, MI 49091

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,918

577 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jade Klingler of Sturgis, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,918 across 577 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,489 132
2024 General $2,329 120
2023 General $1,680 115
2022 General $1,791 109
2021 General $1,629 101

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jade Klingler
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jade Klingler were reported at $2,489. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Jade Klingler Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $1,629 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $1,791 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $1,680 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $2,329 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,489 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,405 96 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,301 96 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $809 32 payments
  4. ITI, Inc. $638 35 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $603 34 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $473 30 payments
  7. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $372 16 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $342 13 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $328 16 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $310 19 payments
  11. Other $3,338 190 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,787 575 payments
  2. Education $132 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $742 57 payments
  2. Ozempic $730 56 payments
  3. UBRELVY $549 36 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $497 36 payments
  5. CAPLYTA $473 26 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $428 8 payments
  7. QULIPTA $399 27 payments
  8. Auvelity $372 16 payments
  9. Wegovy $355 23 payments
  10. FARXIGA $344 15 payments
  11. Other $7,303 420 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 137 drugs

Part D claims

6,748

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$658,881

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

24.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 61 $93,016
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 79 $84,482
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 72 $67,257
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 67 $63,080
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 50 $44,507
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 37 $39,547
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 36 $35,449
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 43 $24,577
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 15 $20,641
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 17 $16,232

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 137 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$22,917

Of which drugs: $278

Medicare patients

184

Average age 71

Services billed

1,367

128 women, 56 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 25%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
COPD 16%
Depression 15%
Heart failure 14%
Cancer 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 17 450 $91
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 96 $70

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$182 — —
CAPLYTA
$159 — —
VRAYLAR
$137 — —
Kerendia
$99 — —
NURTEC ODT
$91 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

577 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record