Who Paid My Doc
Jaclynn Powell
Diagnostic Radiology Washington, DC Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1831331396 CMS profile 557691
1150 Varnum St Ne, Washington, DC 20017
General payments
$1,225
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2023, Jaclynn Powell of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,225 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Diagnostic Radiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
1 row| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | General | $1,225 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Jaclynn Powell
- Diagnostic Radiology median
- Middle half of Diagnostic Radiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Jaclynn Powell were reported at $0. Among 8,325 Diagnostic Radiology profiles paid that year, the median was $112 and the middle half received between $32 and $349.
Show as a table
| Year | Jaclynn Powell | Diagnostic Radiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $108 | $29–$318 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $65 | $21–$252 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $92 | $24–$292 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $104 | $29–$294 | $149 |
| 2023 | $1,225 | $110 | $29–$337 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $113 | $30–$356 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $112 | $32–$349 | $169 |
Breakdown
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 107 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$134,974
Medicare patients
1,404
Services billed
11,106
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 73% | |
| Arthritis | 52% | |
| Diabetes | 30% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 28% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 26% | |
| Depression | 23% | |
| Osteoporosis | 21% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 20% |
| Drug given in the clinic | Where | Patients | Services | Paid by Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 | Office | 88 | 8,785 | $908 |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
1 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Diagnostic Radiology in District of Columbia
Rachel Brem
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Jason Katzen
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Nora McDermott-Tabori
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Jocelyn Rapelyea
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Brooke Wolvin
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Andrew Hall
Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC
Related records
Diagnostic Radiology in District of Columbia
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Diagnostic Radiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in District of Columbia
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.