Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jack Flyer

Cardiovascular Disease Chevy Chase, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1871569483 CMS profile 130652

5530 Wisconsin Ave Ste 700, Chevy Chase, MD 20815

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,931

493 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jack Flyer of Chevy Chase, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,931 across 493 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,693 83
2024 General $2,322 73
2023 General $2,183 86
2022 General $2,556 76
2021 General $1,326 43
2020 General $1,535 47
2019 General $6,316 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jack Flyer
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jack Flyer were reported at $2,693. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Jack Flyer Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $6,316 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $1,535 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,326 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $2,556 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $2,183 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $2,322 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $2,693 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,335 39 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $1,251 12 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,098 44 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $997 49 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $806 44 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $796 9 payments
  7. Medicure Pharma Inc. $600 2 payments
  8. Atricure, Inc. $587 13 payments
  9. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $586 9 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $584 15 payments
  11. Other $6,290 257 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,653 481 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,268 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $571 4 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $300 1 payment
  5. Education $138 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $5,008 26 payments
  2. Repatha $729 32 payments
  3. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $720 35 payments
  4. VERQUVO $635 22 payments
  5. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor $600 2 payments
  6. XARELTO $567 21 payments
  7. Kerendia $530 26 payments
  8. EPI-SENSE GUIDED COAGULATION SYSTEM WITH VISITRAX $434 6 payments
  9. LEQVIO $429 22 payments
  10. Ozempic $407 11 payments
  11. Other $10,168 355 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugs

Part D claims

6,525

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,526,186

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

32.9%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 683 $818,732
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 169 $205,118
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 116 $143,513
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 80 $78,441
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 46 $64,136
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 39 $34,223
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 22 $23,952
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 17 $15,438
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 11 $14,553
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 589 $11,392

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,012,244

Of which drugs: $2,222

Medicare patients

2,133

Average age 78

Services billed

9,722

949 women, 1,184 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 48%
Arthritis 43%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Diabetes 21%
Cancer 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 106 404 $2,222

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $184
$184 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $122
$122 683 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $121
$121 — —
OPSUMIT
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $121
$121 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $117
$117 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

493 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record