Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Isaac Beshay

Family Medicine Costa Mesa, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1962434241 CMS profile 270055

2200 Harbor Blvd Ste B210, Costa Mesa, CA 92627

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,096

593 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,058

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,459,524 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Isaac Beshay of Costa Mesa, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,096 across 593 general payments and $2,058 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,459,524 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,921 71
2024 General $2,678 81
2023 General $1,927 65
2023 Research $2,058 4
2022 General $1,453 64
2021 General $2,011 93
2020 General $1,809 108
2019 General $5,296 111

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Isaac Beshay
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Isaac Beshay were reported at $1,921. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Isaac Beshay Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,296 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,809 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,011 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,453 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,927 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,678 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,921 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk AS $3,110 10 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,110 59 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,325 61 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $982 34 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $859 40 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $736 44 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $631 31 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $604 26 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $561 26 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $551 24 payments
  11. Other $5,628 238 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,561 578 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $2,218 7 payments
  3. Education $317 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MOUNJARO $637 18 payments
  2. AIRSUPRA $601 16 payments
  3. FARXIGA $600 29 payments
  4. BREZTRI $515 9 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $499 24 payments
  6. MYRBETRIQ $485 31 payments
  7. Ozempic $460 20 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $440 19 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $395 16 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $384 18 payments
  11. Other $10,754 526 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,058 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 151 drugs

Part D claims

7,802

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$991,780

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

25.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 162 $169,047
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 120 $83,240
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 73 $75,711
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 85 $73,210
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 11 $60,127
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 52 $56,515
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 58 $55,092
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 54 $42,972
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 32 $26,546
Viberzi Eluxadoline Brand 13 $25,791

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 151 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,180

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

125

Average age 69

Services billed

429

72 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 54%
Diabetes 42%
Arthritis 42%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Heart failure 14%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $378
$378 73 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $292
$292 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $285
$285 — —
Tirosint
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $125
$125 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $120
$120 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

597 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record