Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Imelyn Lahey

Family Medicine Newark, DE Medical Doctor

NPI 1780999300 CMS profile 1182651

620 Stanton Christiana Rd Ste 305, Newark, DE 19713

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,139

454 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Imelyn Lahey of Newark, DE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,139 across 454 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,214 60
2024 General $1,716 86
2023 General $1,732 101
2022 General $1,413 89
2021 General $880 52
2020 General $865 52
2019 General $321 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Imelyn Lahey
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Imelyn Lahey were reported at $1,214. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Imelyn Lahey Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $321 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $865 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $880 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,413 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,732 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,716 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,214 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,227 101 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,095 35 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $717 25 payments
  4. Astellas Pharma US Inc $696 48 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $685 36 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $661 44 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $617 32 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $603 32 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $472 22 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $239 13 payments
  11. Other $1,127 66 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,918 448 payments
  2. Education $222 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $798 30 payments
  2. QULIPTA $778 66 payments
  3. UBRELVY $709 55 payments
  4. FreeStyle Libre 3 $500 12 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $425 30 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $349 15 payments
  7. Ozempic $332 16 payments
  8. Veozah $329 30 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $318 5 payments
  10. COMIRNATY $286 14 payments
  11. Other $5,374 313 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 102 drugs

Part D claims

5,119

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$405,784

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 54 $75,863
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 43 $55,308
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 25 $33,806
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 27 $30,433
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 17 $28,242
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 18 $23,496
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 14 $19,506
Trijardy Xr Empaglifloz/Linaglip/Metformin Brand 12 $13,341
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $11,735
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 13 $10,991

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 102 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$206,006

Of which drugs: $26,464

Medicare patients

468

Average age 74

Services billed

3,918

328 women, 140 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 22%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 61 61 $17,743
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 109 109 $8,652

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$217 — —
JARDIANCE
$156 54 —
UBRELVY
$141 — —
Veozah
$132 — —
AREXVY
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

454 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Delaware

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record