Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Igor Turok

Pain Medicine Wallingford, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1972575801 CMS profile 135066

67 Masonic Ave, Suite 2400, Wallingford, CT 06492

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,724

173 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Igor Turok of Wallingford, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,724 across 173 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 54th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $116 5
2024 General $178 9
2023 General $309 15
2022 General $277 15
2021 General $514 28
2020 General $167 9
2019 General $1,163 92

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Igor Turok
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Igor Turok were reported at $116. Among 95 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $405 and the middle half received between $116 and $1,740.

Show as a table
Year Igor Turok Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,163 $298 $103–$1,153 $163
2020 $167 $188 $57–$916 $114
2021 $514 $365 $109–$1,150 $132
2022 $277 $498 $104–$1,575 $149
2023 $309 $334 $108–$1,267 $160
2024 $178 $544 $144–$1,302 $164
2025 $116 $405 $116–$1,740 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $838 47 payments
  2. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $404 44 payments
  3. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $197 10 payments
  4. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $156 8 payments
  5. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $149 16 payments
  6. Merz North America, Inc. $146 3 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $114 6 payments
  8. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $102 4 payments
  9. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $64 4 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $60 3 payments
  11. Other $493 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,634 152 payments
  2. Education $90 21 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $750 39 payments
  2. XTAMPZA $262 20 payments
  3. ZTLido 30 POUCH in 1 CARTON 1 PATCH in 1 POUCH $156 8 payments
  4. DYSPORT $156 8 payments
  5. Xeomin $129 2 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $102 4 payments
  7. QULIPTA $85 8 payments
  8. Horizant $80 10 payments
  9. Evoke $64 4 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $60 3 payments
  11. Other $991 58 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,185

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$104,680

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 14 $13,110
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 29 $12,523
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 32 $11,405
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 16 $11,042
Suboxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 11 $8,928
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 333 $7,952
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 14 $5,726
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 12 $5,564
Lidocaine Generic 19 $4,566
Etodolac Generic 56 $3,825

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$172,802

Of which drugs: $32,046

Medicare patients

116

Average age 72

Services billed

6,573

66 women, 50 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Depression 34%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Diabetes 20%
Heart failure 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abobotulinumtoxina, 5 units J0586 Office 15 3,000 $20,516
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 19 148 $819
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 38 532 $392

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $88
$88 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $12
$12 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

173 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record