Who Paid My Doc
Huy Pham
Diagnostic Radiology Savannah, GA Medical Doctor
NPI 1679983688 CMS profile 2791171
4700 Waters Ave, Savannah, GA 31404
General payments
$3,028
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Huy Pham of Savannah, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,028 across 15 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $2,519 | 9 | |
| 2024 | General | $422 | 4 | |
| 2022 | General | $87 | 2 |
Beside peers
- Huy Pham
- Diagnostic Radiology median
- Middle half of Diagnostic Radiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Huy Pham were reported at $2,519. Among 8,325 Diagnostic Radiology profiles paid that year, the median was $112 and the middle half received between $32 and $349.
Show as a table
| Year | Huy Pham | Diagnostic Radiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $108 | $29–$318 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $65 | $21–$252 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $92 | $24–$292 | $132 |
| 2022 | $87 | $104 | $29–$294 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $110 | $29–$337 | $160 |
| 2024 | $422 | $113 | $30–$356 | $164 |
| 2025 | $2,519 | $112 | $32–$349 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$111,690
Medicare patients
1,802
Services billed
3,657
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 57% | |
| Arthritis | 44% | |
| Osteoporosis | 27% | |
| Depression | 22% | |
| Cancer | 19% | |
| Diabetes | 17% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 14% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 8% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
15 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Diagnostic Radiology in Georgia
Patricia Balthazar
Diagnostic Radiology · Atlanta, GA
Felix Gonzalez
Diagnostic Radiology · Atlanta, GA
Cameron Kersey
Diagnostic Radiology · Columbus, GA
Diego Martin
Diagnostic Radiology · Atlanta, GA
Kimberly Hutcherson
Diagnostic Radiology · Lawrenceville, GA
Henry Krebs
Diagnostic Radiology · Newnan, GA
Related records
Diagnostic Radiology in Georgia
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Diagnostic Radiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Georgia
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.