Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hong Kim

Nephrology Garden Grove, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1396727764 CMS profile 335903

12665 Garden Grove Blvd, Suite 503, Garden Grove, CA 92843

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,948

1,058 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hong Kim of Garden Grove, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,948 across 1,058 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,152 100
2024 General $2,303 113
2023 General $2,915 137
2022 General $2,992 154
2021 General $4,182 205
2020 General $2,919 165
2019 General $3,486 184

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hong Kim
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hong Kim were reported at $2,152. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Hong Kim Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,486 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $2,919 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $4,182 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $2,992 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $2,915 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $2,303 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $2,152 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,441 182 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,660 85 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,466 71 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,308 59 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,113 51 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $925 47 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $921 48 payments
  8. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $883 41 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $845 34 payments
  10. Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $844 37 payments
  11. Other $8,542 403 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,641 1,052 payments
  2. Education $307 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CREON $2,036 152 payments
  2. LINZESS $1,915 132 payments
  3. ZENPEP $1,503 65 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,251 64 payments
  5. Ozempic $1,087 68 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $982 45 payments
  7. Velphoro $782 34 payments
  8. XARELTO $693 34 payments
  9. ENTRESTO $692 34 payments
  10. TRULICITY $667 35 payments
  11. Other $15,407 761 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 248 drugs

Part D claims

35,155

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,763,155

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

26.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 746 $896,558
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 1,004 $323,687
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 455 $297,817
Prolia Denosumab Brand 176 $287,983
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 315 $239,445
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 298 $234,073
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 119 $190,307
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 58 $177,841
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 122 $136,564
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 96 $132,276

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 248 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$321,271

Of which drugs: $6,550

Medicare patients

529

Average age 79

Services billed

5,209

329 women, 200 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 58%
Diabetes 53%
Arthritis 38%
Osteoporosis 36%
Heart failure 35%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 27%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 16 16 $4,618
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 94 195 $163
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 16 42 $23
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 12 52 $18
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 31 202 $17
5% dextrose/normal saline (500 ml = 1 unit) J7042 Office 11 12 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CREON
$269 746 —
LINZESS
$229 134 —
IBSRELA
$203 — —
Velphoro
$125 58 —
REXULTI
$118 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

1,058 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record