Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hilary Lott

Nurse Practitioner Batesville, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1184107898 CMS profile 11098116

107 Eureka St, Batesville, MS 38606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,525

343 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hilary Lott of Batesville, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,525 across 343 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,162 68
2024 General $1,242 62
2023 General $1,018 68
2022 General $716 56
2021 General $1,387 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hilary Lott
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hilary Lott were reported at $1,162. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Hilary Lott Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,387 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $716 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,018 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,242 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,162 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $910 81 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $707 38 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $465 33 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $450 23 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $320 19 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $298 18 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $277 17 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $265 15 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $251 12 payments
  10. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $211 8 payments
  11. Other $1,371 79 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,525 343 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $505 26 payments
  2. UBRELVY $457 36 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $352 25 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $348 22 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $298 18 payments
  6. XARELTO $277 17 payments
  7. QULIPTA $269 28 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $266 16 payments
  9. Kerendia $265 15 payments
  10. REXULTI $251 12 payments
  11. Other $3,115 189 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 122 drugs

Part D claims

5,663

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$449,997

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

19.2%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 74 $85,635
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 64 $55,326
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 44 $51,735
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 47 $44,222
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 27 $24,366
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $22,468
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 20 $18,540
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 22 $18,203
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $14,624
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 17 $14,578

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 122 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$89,870

Of which drugs: $6,587

Medicare patients

487

Average age 74

Services billed

4,358

292 women, 195 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Heart failure 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 57 57 $4,591
Injection, lincomycin hcl, up to 300 mg J2010 Office 28 36 $232
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 154 196 $58
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 27 36 $18
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 181 228 $18
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 17 27 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $211
$211 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $117
$117 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $86
$86 20 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $85
$85 64 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $78
$78 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

343 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record