Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hertzel Sure

Internal Medicine Elmhurst, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1083727762 CMS profile 139721

94-25 60Th Avenue, Suite B4, Elmhurst, NY 11373

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$90,714

1,096 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hertzel Sure of Elmhurst, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $90,714 across 1,096 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $19,507 114
2024 General $22,794 154
2023 General $23,483 186
2022 General $15,980 167
2021 General $3,307 171
2020 General $2,845 164
2019 General $2,797 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hertzel Sure
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hertzel Sure were reported at $19,507. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Hertzel Sure Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,797 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,845 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,307 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $15,980 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $23,483 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $22,794 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $19,507 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $71,553 136 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,665 116 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,243 112 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,982 111 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,494 80 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,153 56 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,002 62 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $955 69 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $907 33 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $571 30 payments
  11. Other $6,189 291 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $66,740 36 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $23,944 1,056 payments
  3. Education $30 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $71,553 136 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,243 66 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,223 71 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,200 58 payments
  5. FARXIGA $1,116 45 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $1,018 62 payments
  7. XARELTO $977 60 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $912 66 payments
  9. Repatha $632 24 payments
  10. NUCALA $605 31 payments
  11. Other $14,283 708 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 139 drugs

Part D claims

8,018

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,638,762

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

33.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 321 $234,455
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 179 $173,112
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 104 $111,589
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 135 $106,499
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 59 $91,630
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 59 $89,978
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 82 $86,680
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 84 $84,670
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 84 $54,866
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 52 $48,853

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 139 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 93 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$137,329

Of which drugs: $967

Medicare patients

136

Average age 74

Services billed

3,530

68 women, 68 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 71%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Depression 22%
COPD 16%
Osteoporosis 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 30 30 $643
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 33 82 $76
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 20 30 $63
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 21 31 $33

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$20,313 321 —
VRAYLAR
$235 — —
AIRSUPRA
$205 — —
Repatha
$159 18 —
XIFAXAN
$128 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,096 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record