Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Heidi Joist

Nephrology Nampa, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1366409948 CMS profile 243606

9850 W St Lukes Dr Ste 190, Nampa, ID 83687

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,185

207 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Heidi Joist of Nampa, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,185 across 207 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $230 2
2024 General $146 1
2023 General $676 31
2022 General $694 39
2021 General $1,056 44
2020 General $473 33
2019 General $911 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Heidi Joist
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Heidi Joist were reported at $230. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Heidi Joist Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $911 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $473 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $1,056 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $694 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $676 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $146 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $230 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $646 33 payments
  2. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $622 24 payments
  3. Relypsa, Inc. $559 51 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $464 16 payments
  5. Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $317 19 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $300 12 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $236 12 payments
  8. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $178 4 payments
  9. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $167 4 payments
  10. Retrophin, Inc. $166 2 payments
  11. Other $530 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,083 203 payments
  2. Education $102 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Auryxia $646 33 payments
  2. JYNARQUE Nephrology $353 15 payments
  3. FARXIGA $322 7 payments
  4. Velphoro $317 19 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $300 12 payments
  6. Veltassa Hyperkalemia $290 33 payments
  7. Veltassa Hyperkalemia $245 16 payments
  8. JYNARQUE Nephrology $208 8 payments
  9. LUPKYNIS $178 4 payments
  10. INJECTAFER $165 8 payments
  11. Other $1,040 52 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

555

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$80,248

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

12.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 42 $39,672
Auryxia Ferric Citrate Brand 13 $30,064
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 33 $3,152
Megestrol Acetate Generic 12 $1,079
Calcium Acetate Generic 11 $1,074
Hydralazine Hcl Generic 52 $910
Carvedilol Generic 66 $806
Calcitriol Generic 26 $703
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 65 $418
Famotidine Generic 18 $315

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

207 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record