Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hee Soo Jeong

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1174701429 CMS profile 1079988

2675 W Olympic Blvd, #202, Los Angeles, CA 90006

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,610

59 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Hee Soo Jeong of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,610 across 59 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $161 5
2022 General $164 7
2021 General $517 14
2020 General $323 16
2019 General $445 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hee Soo Jeong
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hee Soo Jeong were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Hee Soo Jeong Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $445 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $323 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $517 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $164 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $161 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,019 45 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $131 2 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $131 1 payment
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $130 2 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $72 1 payment
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $49 3 payments
  7. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $48 3 payments
  8. ASCEND Therapeutics US, LLC $18 1 payment
  9. RedHill Biopharma Inc. $11 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $1,592 58 payments
  2. Gift $18 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Vascepa Cardiovascular $738 32 payments
  2. Vascepa Hypertriglyceridemia $281 13 payments
  3. Cobalt $131 1 payment
  4. HUMIRA $117 1 payment
  5. TRULANCE $75 1 payment
  6. CARDIOMEMS $72 1 payment
  7. XIFAXAN $57 1 payment
  8. SHINGRIX $49 3 payments
  9. BOOSTRIX $49 3 payments
  10. BINOSTO $18 1 payment
  11. Other $49 4 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 207 drugs

Part D claims

30,027

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,666,992

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 598 $686,077
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 1,356 $585,791
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 480 $366,525
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 343 $267,068
Lidocaine Generic 796 $211,011
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 269 $164,794
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 161 $118,160
Prolia Denosumab Brand 62 $106,128
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 136 $101,496
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 116 $81,160

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 207 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$318,043

Of which drugs: $2,024

Medicare patients

581

Average age 79

Services billed

5,251

381 women, 200 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 56%
Diabetes 54%
Osteoporosis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 23%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 93 93 $1,992
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 24 35 $13
Injection, cefazolin sodium, 500 mg J0690 Office 13 18 $11
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 13 17 $1

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

59 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record