Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Heather Martin

Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care Seneca, SC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1083278279 CMS profile 5756076

115 Eagles Nest Dr Ste B, Seneca, SC 29678

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,873

377 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Heather Martin of Seneca, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,873 across 377 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,174 49
2024 General $1,658 79
2023 General $1,413 83
2022 General $1,266 78
2021 General $1,362 88

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Heather Martin
  • Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Heather Martin were reported at $1,174. Among 4,814 Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles paid that year, the median was $169 and the middle half received between $51 and $499.

Show as a table
Year Heather Martin Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $1,362 $137 $39–$445 $132
2022 $1,266 $139 $44–$421 $149
2023 $1,413 $163 $53–$481 $160
2024 $1,658 $176 $54–$511 $164
2025 $1,174 $169 $51–$499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,659 72 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $678 46 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $565 37 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $532 29 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $402 24 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $392 23 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $359 20 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $302 17 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $231 11 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $202 13 payments
  11. Other $1,551 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,873 377 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. WATCHMAN FLX $636 29 payments
  2. Kerendia $565 37 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $532 29 payments
  4. FARAPULSE $446 14 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $386 23 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $341 23 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $214 13 payments
  8. Ozempic $201 12 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $193 13 payments
  10. Repatha $172 12 payments
  11. Other $4,174 232 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 111 drugs

Part D claims

5,120

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$359,949

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

15.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 63 $83,784
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 30 $40,911
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 27 $38,435
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 26 $36,868
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 17 $29,573
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 17 $15,957
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 17 $13,433
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 13 $11,650
Invokana Canagliflozin Brand 12 $11,461
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 13 $9,411

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 111 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,114

Of which drugs: $1,010

Medicare patients

184

Average age 74

Services billed

945

113 women, 71 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 41%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 23 23 $831
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 16 80 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $118
$118 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $95
$95 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $77
$77 30 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $60
$60 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $51
$51 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

377 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record