Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Harsh Shah

Hematology & Oncology Detroit, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1023456324 CMS profile 4219189

4201 Saint Antoine St Ste 5C, Detroit, MI 48201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$38,350

60 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$39,531

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,553,333 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Harsh Shah of Detroit, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $38,350 across 60 general payments and $39,531 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,553,333 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $17,531 26
2025 Research $3,200 1
2024 General $2,999 4
2024 Research $1,270 2
2023 General $9,749 8
2023 Research $35,061 2
2022 General $7,844 20
2019 General $227 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Harsh Shah
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Harsh Shah were reported at $17,531. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Harsh Shah Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $227 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $0 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $0 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $7,844 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $9,749 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $2,999 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $17,531 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $11,443 14 payments
  2. ADC Therapeutics America, Inc. $7,424 10 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $4,485 4 payments
  4. Acrotech Biopharma LLC $3,749 5 payments
  5. Epizyme, Inc., $3,118 3 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,074 5 payments
  7. Sobi, Inc $2,670 1 payment
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $1,224 2 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $394 7 payments
  10. Taiho Oncology, Inc. $378 4 payments
  11. Other $391 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $23,449 12 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,381 13 payments
  3. Honoraria $4,999 1 payment
  4. Food and Beverage $2,410 31 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,838 2 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $272 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ADCETRIS $15,443 13 payments
  2. ZYNLONTA $6,024 9 payments
  3. BELEODAQ $3,749 5 payments
  4. TAZVERIK $3,118 3 payments
  5. GAMIFANT $2,670 1 payment
  6. VENCLEXTA $1,224 2 payments
  7. EPKINLY $164 2 payments
  8. CALQUENCE $135 1 payment
  9. ELREXFIO $132 1 payment
  10. TIBSOVO $127 1 payment
  11. Other $199 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $35,061 2 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $4,470 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

433

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$1,508,695

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

34.6%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 46 $661,965
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 36 $539,623
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 23 $303,882
Acyclovir Generic 111 $1,834
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 25 $558
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 36 $272
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim Brand 45 $222
Levofloxacin Generic 37 $122
Allopurinol Generic 18 $83
Omeprazole Generic 19 $82

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$44,602

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

161

Average age 74

Services billed

815

63 women, 98 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 42%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Depression 30%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Heart failure 22%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELEODAQ
  • Acrotech Biopharma LLC $48
$48 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

65 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record