Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Harry Burger

General Practice Cedar Crest, NM Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1477510543 CMS profile 112525

12127 B Hwy 14 N, Ste 5, Cedar Crest, NM 87008

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$512

30 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Harry Burger of Cedar Crest, NM is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $512 across 30 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14 1
2023 General $189 10
2022 General $100 5
2021 General $88 6
2020 General $121 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Harry Burger
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Harry Burger were reported at $14. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Harry Burger General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $121 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $88 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $100 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $189 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $0 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $14 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $195 10 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $96 6 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $88 6 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $59 4 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $23 1 payment
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $19 1 payment
  7. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $18 1 payment
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $15 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $512 30 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. QULIPTA $166 9 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $96 6 payments
  3. Ozempic $96 6 payments
  4. PREVNAR 13 $40 3 payments
  5. COLOGUARD DNA CAPTURE REAGENTS $31 2 payments
  6. SYMBICORT $30 2 payments
  7. UBRELVY $29 1 payment
  8. JARDIANCE $23 1 payment
  9. Vascepa $19 1 payment
  10. QUVIVIQ $18 1 payment
  11. Other $108 7 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 5 drugs

Part D claims

82

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$1,666

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

29.3%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gabapentin Generic 22 $779
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 21 $329
Losartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Brand 13 $195
Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Lisinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide Brand 11 $183
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 15 $180

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$9,472

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

100

Average age 82

Services billed

163

57 women, 43 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Depression 73%
Alzheimer's or dementia 62%
Arthritis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 42%
Diabetes 41%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Osteoporosis 33%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

30 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record