Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Harold Bays

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Louisville, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1316953920 CMS profile 105280

3288 Illinois Ave, Suite 101, Louisville, KY 40213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$214,196

289 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$46,919

Paid to them · 48 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$12,656,503 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Harold Bays of Louisville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $214,196 across 289 general payments and $46,919 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $12,656,503 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $38,254 49
2025 Research $6,392 1
2024 General $54,023 71
2024 Research $17,558 14
2023 General $23,753 57
2023 Research $3,460 16
2022 General $19,734 31
2022 Research $8,520 11
2021 General $52,061 32
2021 Research $1,668 2
2020 General $16,718 8
2020 Research $7,744 3
2019 General $9,654 41
2019 Research $1,577 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Harold Bays
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Harold Bays were reported at $38,254. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Harold Bays Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $9,654 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $16,718 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $52,061 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $19,734 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $23,753 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $54,023 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $38,254 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $54,965 51 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $38,480 120 payments
  3. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $34,954 22 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $26,191 25 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $22,669 21 payments
  6. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $9,914 15 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $7,650 2 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $6,659 1 payment
  9. Novo Nordisk AS $3,729 14 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $2,882 2 payments
  11. Other $6,103 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $106,412 41 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $60,227 27 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $32,568 128 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $14,893 90 payments
  5. Education $97 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NEXLETOL $34,954 22 payments
  2. NEXLIZET $34,954 22 payments
  3. Wegovy $14,206 13 payments
  4. Saxenda $6,367 4 payments
  5. Repatha $4,741 4 payments
  6. EYLEA $2,556 3 payments
  7. Ozempic $1,912 6 payments
  8. PRALUENT $1,803 1 payment
  9. Arcalyst $450 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $31,621 16 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $6,392 1 payment
  3. Pfizer Inc. $4,060 2 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk AS $3,420 17 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,401 11 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $25 1 payment

Records

337 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record