Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hardeep Phull

Hematology & Oncology Escondido, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1306103510 CMS profile 826566

2125 Citracado Pkwy Ste 220, Escondido, CA 92029

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$338,581

335 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hardeep Phull of Escondido, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $338,581 across 335 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $77,409 74
2024 General $39,560 45
2023 General $75,126 67
2022 General $96,891 92
2021 General $27,472 32
2020 General $16,007 15
2019 General $6,117 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hardeep Phull
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hardeep Phull were reported at $77,409. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Hardeep Phull Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $6,117 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $16,007 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $27,472 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $96,891 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $75,126 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $39,560 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $77,409 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $134,595 127 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $95,478 74 payments
  3. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $92,039 69 payments
  4. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. $11,661 13 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $3,048 5 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $434 11 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $239 5 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $135 3 payments
  9. Tempus AI, Inc $128 5 payments
  10. Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $121 1 payment
  11. Other $703 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $159,843 65 payments
  2. Honoraria $83,945 21 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $42,035 21 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $23,923 88 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $20,407 6 payments
  6. Food and Beverage $8,134 128 payments
  7. Education $294 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FOTIVDA $134,595 127 payments
  2. XPOVIO Oncology $82,821 63 payments
  3. SARCLISA $65,745 52 payments
  4. ELITEK Oncology $20,826 15 payments
  5. KRAZATI $11,661 13 payments
  6. XPOVIO Oncology $9,219 6 payments
  7. ELITEK Oncology $6,017 5 payments
  8. LIBTAYO $3,048 5 payments
  9. JEVTANA $1,485 3 payments
  10. OPDIVO $206 4 payments
  11. Other $1,180 39 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 9 drugs

Part D claims

388

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 2,306

Drug cost

$254,307

Median for Geriatric Medicine: $150,713

Branded share of claims

10.3%

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 16.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 14 $232,338
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 97 $15,071
Letrozole Generic 83 $2,478
Ondansetron Odt Ondansetron Brand 26 $1,287
Hydroxyurea Generic 37 $1,069
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 24 $745
Anastrozole Generic 19 $465
Tamoxifen Citrate Generic 21 $448
Prednisone Generic 67 $406

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,814 Part D prescribers listed as Geriatric Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$74,043

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

164

Average age 76

Services billed

580

89 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Cancer 46%
Arthritis 46%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Heart failure 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FOTIVDA
  • Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $30,343
$30,343 — —
SARCLISA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $6,653
$6,653 — —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,578
$1,578 — —
XPOVIO
  • Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $815
$815 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $26
$26 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

335 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record